[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] g722 decoder, no licensing fame

Diego Biurrun diego
Fri Apr 10 07:01:01 CEST 2009

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:22:48AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> i have good news and bad news
> the good are that quality might be significatly improvable by using
> trellis/viterbi, the bad news is that the encoder is rejected unless
> you either implement that or proof that it cant be done 
> (and i dont mean full viterbi but keeping more than 1 possible
> previous bitstream that is not just 1 previous and the best current
> quantized value but several best past ones X several current quantized
> values ...)

Kenan, submit the decoder first, you can worry about the encoder later.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list