[FFmpeg-devel] maintainer duties
Sat Apr 11 00:05:46 CEST 2009
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:29:45PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:55:28PM +0200, Benjamin Larsson wrote:
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> I'm complaining about deprecated functions not being replaced.
> >> >
> >> > which functions?
> >> >
> >> I'm guessing av_random() was one.
> > and why did noone complain/tell me when i did drop it without changing
> > its uses?
> GCC did complain.
my question pretty much was why iam being attacked now while thouse who
attack clearly did not consider it a good idea to ever point out the
issues in a polite way before.
I mean yeah i know people dont tell me because then i would have fixed
it and its so much nicer to have something to whine about.
> Another example is all the AVFrac stuff. It was
> deprecated, then everybody failed to replace it, and it was
> undeprecated again.
yes, AVFrac deprecation was also something that was years in the past,
noone realized that it couldnt be replaced easily until years later and
this sub-therad was about easy to replace things, AVFrac certainly is
not. But yes deprecating it failed, we undid it, should i pick a
random fixed bug and whine about it too ?
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Frequently ignored awnser#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. User
questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML.
And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel