[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] FFmpeg Foundation
Sat Dec 5 17:05:39 CET 2009
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:59:44PM +1100, pross at xvid.org wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:41:02AM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > Ramiro Polla <ramiro.polla at gmail.com> writes:
> > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:48 PM, compn <tempn at twmi.rr.com> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:49:09 -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > >>>On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > >>>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 06:58:03PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > >>>>> * FFmpeg Foundation
> > >>
> > >> can we actually use 'mpeg' in the name? isnt it trademarked?
> > >
> > > MPHG - the Moving Picture Hackers Group =)
> > Nice, but too much confusion: MPEG, MHEG, MPHQ, Monty Python and the
> > Holy Grail, ...
> Further on the same tangent:
Theres a problem with all these proposals, to quote a quote:
"In Delaware, the name generally must include one of the following words:
association, company, corporation, club, foundation, fund, incorporated,
institute, society, union, syndicate or limited. It must not contain
words like "bank" if there's the potential to mislead the public about
the nature of the business (if not legally a bank). They also do a
search for existing corporations to make sure that they won't have
multiple corporations with the same name.
FFMpeg Foundation works fine, so would many other combinations."
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your
right to say it. -- Voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel