[FFmpeg-devel] lavfi state of affairs

Baptiste Coudurier baptiste.coudurier
Tue Feb 3 02:32:47 CET 2009

Hi Stefano,

Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Wednesday 2009-01-21 20:50:48 +0100, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
>> On date Tuesday 2009-01-20 09:37:21 +0100, V?ctor Paesa encoded:
>>> Hi,
>>> Stefano Sabatini said:
>>>> On date Monday 2009-01-19 21:04:13 -0800, Baptiste Coudurier encoded:
> [...]
>>>>> How is the situation, concerning full integration in svn ?
>>>>> How useable the filters are ? I mean the situation seems to work for
>>>>> you, and in many way it seems to be at least better than the current
>>>>> vhook implementation. What's left for the merge ?
>>>> The main issues is to fix the regression tests for ffmpeg, YUV tests
>>>> seem to break regression, I still didn't investigate on it, mainly
>>>> because I'm lazy and write filters is so much fun ;-).
> [...] 
>> Do you have any hint regarding what could be the cause of it?
> With the help of Vitor I discovered that the scale filter was using
> different flags for the scaler, the attached patch, which is not meant
> to be reviewed, fixes regression.

Ok, nice, so what's left ? We need to drop vhook seriously, it really
slow everyone down :>

Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
checking for life_signs in -lkenny... no
FFmpeg maintainer                                  http://www.ffmpeg.org

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list