[FFmpeg-devel] lavfi state of affairs

[Benjamin Larsson]

Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:32:47PM -0800, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>   
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>     
>>> On date Wednesday 2009-01-21 20:50:48 +0100, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
>>>       
>>>> On date Tuesday 2009-01-20 09:37:21 +0100, V?ctor Paesa encoded:
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefano Sabatini said:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On date Monday 2009-01-19 21:04:13 -0800, Baptiste Coudurier encoded:
>>>>>>             
>>> [...]
>>>       
>>>>>>> How is the situation, concerning full integration in svn ?
>>>>>>> How useable the filters are ? I mean the situation seems to work for
>>>>>>> you, and in many way it seems to be at least better than the current
>>>>>>> vhook implementation. What's left for the merge ?
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> The main issues is to fix the regression tests for ffmpeg, YUV tests
>>>>>> seem to break regression, I still didn't investigate on it, mainly
>>>>>> because I'm lazy and write filters is so much fun ;-).
>>>>>>             
>>> [...] 
>>>       
>>>> Do you have any hint regarding what could be the cause of it?
>>>>         
>>> With the help of Vitor I discovered that the scale filter was using
>>> different flags for the scaler, the attached patch, which is not meant
>>> to be reviewed, fixes regression.
>>>       
>> Ok, nice, so what's left ? We need to drop vhook seriously, it really
>> slow everyone down :>
>>     
>
> you have my approval to drop/disable/svn rm vhook
>   

As suggested in another thread can we do that after the upcoming release ?

MvH
Benjamin Larsson