[FFmpeg-devel] xvmc_render.h ---> xvmc.h

Benoit Fouet benoit.fouet
Wed Feb 11 16:03:39 CET 2009


On 02/11/2009 01:04 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>   
>> On 02/09/2009 12:58 PM, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>>     
>>> On 2/9/09, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:00:52AM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:20:02AM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> I still oppose the change as it brings more confusion
>>>>>> and have no advantages of any sort.
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> This seems a funny argument, considering _render is used nowhere else
>>>>> (so it is a mystery what it is supposed to signify), and even if
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> i dont want to disturb you guys while trying to repaint the bike but
>>>> what about vdpau_pixfmt.h ?
>>>>         
>>> How do you dare to give actually reasonable proposition! ;)
>>>
>>> I still prefer _render as something done by 3D render,
>>> however I cannot deny that this header contains structures placed
>>> in pixfmt buffers and passed only when this pixel format is used.
>>>
>>> I just hope it won't be confused with PixFmtInfo.
>>>       
>> has Michael's proposal been completely forgotten ?
>> it looks nice when you look at the file content.
>>     
>
> I just asked whether there is
>
>   Anybody who prefers xvmc_pixfmt.h over xmvc.h?
>
> Are you such a person?
>
>   

yes... but I don't think it matters much...

Ben





More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list