[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] HWAccel infrastructure (take 3)
Wed Feb 18 20:58:41 CET 2009
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Le 18 f?vr. 09 ? 19:12, Michael Niedermayer a ?crit :
> >>> what happens with a buf of random content and buf_size of 1
> >>> will it segfault? if not how do you know how much you can copy?
> >>> did i miss
> >>> some buf_size parameter somewhere?
> >> FFmpeg always sends correct data to users, it won't segfault and
> >> it's not
> >> lavc's fault if users can't do a simple subtraction. ;-)
> >> so we have start_slice() with a buf+offset and end_slice() with a
> >> buf_end,
> >> so we can reconstruct the buf_size.
> > that should work, excpt why not send
> > buf+offset and buf_end in end_slice, is start still needed then?
> Still and only for h263dec.c, it only depends on the level of ugliness
> you'd accept. ;-) I am all for a single decode_slice() instead of both
> start_slice(), end_slice() but I still haven't found a beautiful way
> for h263dec.c (and that actually works). If you have ideas...
please explain me how
can be much cleaner than
i must be missing something ...
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your
right to say it. -- Voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel