[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] H.264 timestamps in h264_parser - complete set

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Fri Feb 20 19:50:27 CET 2009

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 04:06:54PM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Ivan Schreter <schreter <at> gmx.net> writes:
> > > based on this, i guess, your patch is ok. Also trying what the official
> > > recommandition is, that is trying to parse it with the flag set and not set
> > > and picking what succeeded could be done, it likely is more reliable than
> > > using the SPS which does really not contain sufficient information
> > > to determine the flag anyway.
> > >
> > >   
> > I take this as OK, it will be applied...
> Since "Small patch after long discussion involving the JVT chairman." will not
> pass the Diego-test, you will have to propose a commit message.

btw, just to clarify the source of the quote it
was from a old thread from their ML not really part of "our" discussion, more
From: Gary Sullivan XXX
To: John Cox XXX, jvt-experts X mail.imtc.org
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 11:29:24 -0700
Subject: [jvt-experts] RE: CpbDpbDelaysPresentFlag & pic_timing

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

While the State exists there can be no freedom; when there is freedom there
will be no State. -- Vladimir Lenin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090220/a4e71acc/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list