[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Add ff_h263_find_resync_marker() function

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Tue Feb 24 15:00:40 CET 2009


On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:30:53AM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Le 23 f?vr. 09 ? 23:14, Michael Niedermayer a ?crit :
> 
> >>> either way duplicating the resync code is not ok
> >>
> >> I had hoped you'd have an idea how to factorize it. ;-)
> >
> > The first thing i see is that ff_h263_resync() is not designed
> > to skip slices, its not fast at that, rather its designed to skip a  
> > few
> > bytes after a slice has been decoded.
> 
> Would that be OK to traverse the slice at a byte level as the  

yes

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
            conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
            can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090224/fd507d9f/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list