Uoti Urpala uoti.urpala
Tue Jan 6 19:51:51 CET 2009

On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:32 +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> On 1/6/09, Ivan Kalvachev <ikalvachev at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 1/6/09, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> >> Here is a patch to do $subject.  Any objections?
> >>
> >> Diego
> >>
> >
> > Not acceptable.
> >
> > This flag have never been meant to be XVMC specific, nor there should
> > be one flag for each acceleration method that is in use.

What would the semantics of a "generic" HWACCEL flag be? What can you do
if you know there's just "some kind of acceleration" without any idea
about the specifics?

> Fixed for the spelling Nazi.

You'll need another revision for grammar (at least "flag has" (or better
"flag was never meant"), "nor should there be").

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list