[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]Remove xvmc_acceleration if favor of hw_acceleration
Thu Jan 8 16:24:22 CET 2009
Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:21:24PM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>> On 1/7/09, Reimar D?ffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
>> > Why is that an issue? Because it gets confusing as hell if someone
>> > actually does add hardware decoding, do we name the next enum then
>> And what do you think the actual hardware decoding would be doing?
> Actually decode? I can see why it was named like that earlier but the
> assumption that hardware decoding will always go directly to the display
> and thus "hardware decoding" means the actual decoding will be in the
> display code is no longer justified IMO.
In a sense, any decoding is done by hardware: the CPU.
mans at mansr.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel