Thu Jan 29 16:12:53 CET 2009
2009/1/29 M?ns Rullg?rd <mans at mansr.com>:
> Jason Garrett-Glaser <darkshikari at gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Ivo <ivop at euronet.nl> wrote:
>>> On Thursday 29 January 2009 15:36, Olivier Galibert wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
>>>> > Why 0.5 ?
>>>> Light green would be better though.
>>> Well, since we do a lot with colors (images, video), we could
>>> really 'number' the releases with (bikeshed) colors:
>>> red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, ultraviolet, etc...
>>> or perhaps use those for 'codenames' or funny names like MPlayer does and
>>> debian and ubuntu and so on.
>> I agree with this one.
> I suggest "Bikeshed" as the first codename.
I very much like it. :)
> That said, I'm rather an anti-fan of codenames. They serve mostly to
> confuse, slightly to amuse, and have no technical merit at all.
Indeed they don't, but they allow expression of the meaning of the
release. I think "Bike shed" fits the bill perfectly.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel