[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] run level decode function for wma?&?wmapro

Sascha Sommer saschasommer
Sat Jun 20 13:12:27 CEST 2009


Hi,

On Samstag, 13. Juni 2009, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:37:52PM +0200, Sascha Sommer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Samstag, 13. Juni 2009, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:07:36AM +0200, Sascha Sommer wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2009, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:17:19PM +0200, Sascha Sommer wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > attached patch adds a run level decode function that can be used
> > > > > > for both wma12 and wmapro.
> > > > >
> > > > > could you split it into a patch factorizig the code out and one
> > > > > changing it ?
> > > > > so that code moving around is seperate from functional changes ...
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Attached patch tries to simplify the run level decode code.
> > > > The order of the different cases for the codes is swapped so that the
> > > > code < 0 check can be dropped (may this happen anyway?).
> > >
> > > it depends on the vlc table, if there are no unused sequences of bits,
> > > that is every sequence of bits will decode as some code then <0 is not
> > > possible
> > > (if it is possible that <0 happens then it must be checked for and
> > > error concealment be performed) but my gut feeling says MS did not
> > > leave unused codes
> >
> > There are no unused codes. Is this patch and the other patch that changes
> > the coefficient buffers to float ok then?
>
> this patch is ok, i stil need to think about the float patch
>

Commited.

Regards

Sascha





More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list