[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] G.729 LSF decoding

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Thu Jun 25 13:37:09 CEST 2009


On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:33:18PM +0700, Vladimir Voroshilov wrote:
> 2009/6/25 Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 05:36:14PM +0700, Vladimir Voroshilov wrote:
> >> 2009/6/25 Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:
> >> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:45:59AM +0700, Vladimir Voroshilov wrote:
> >> >> 2009/6/25 Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:
> >> > [...]
> >> >> @@ -263,6 +282,12 @@ static const int16_t cb_ma_predictor[2][MA_NP][10] = { /* (0.15) */
> >> >> ? ?}
> >> >> ?};
> >> >>
> >> >> +/**
> >> >> + * ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 15 ? ? ? ? 3
> >> >> + * cb_ma_predictor_sum[j][i] = floor( 2 * (1.0 - sum ( cb_ma_predictor_float[j][k][i] ) ) )
> >> >> + * ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?k=0
> >> >
> >> > vertical positions ...
> >>
> >> fixed.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >> @@ -169,6 +169,13 @@ static void lsf_decode(int16_t* lsfq, int16_t* past_quantizer_outputs[MA_NP + 1]
> >> >> ? ? ?ff_acelp_reorder_lsf(lsfq, LSFQ_DIFF_MIN, LSFQ_MIN, LSFQ_MAX, 10);
> >> >> ?}
> >> >>
> >> >> +/**
> >> >> + * Restores LSP parameters using data from previous frame
> >> > [...]
> >> >> ?static void lsf_restore_from_previous(int16_t* lsfq,
> >> >
> >> > lsf or lsp ?
> >>
> >> :(
> >> Neither first not second (according to spec).
> >> This routine restores past LSP quantizer output using LSF from previous frame.
> >
> > the function name is crap as well ...
> 
> function name does not belongs to this patch and are under discussion
> in separate thread, isn't it?
> This patch is not intended to rename function but just add comment to it.
> This patch is irrelevant to function name, imho.
> 
> Am i right that you don't want to accept this patch (even if patch
> itself is ok) since it is related to
> questionable  lsf_restore_from_previous routine ?
> Just say "delay it" and i'll put it to the end of my long patch list
> and will not waste your time for fixing one word in each review.
> 
> There are a lot of questionable things waiting in queue.

iam in favor of delaying this patch until after the function name has
been fixed

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
            conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
            can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090625/49123d0b/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list