[FFmpeg-devel] release status
Sun Mar 1 20:13:02 CET 2009
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:59:00PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:44:12PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:10:59PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > There has been a flurry of activity during the past days. I must admit
> > > I have lost track of current issues. So, are there any regression fixes
> > > pending or any regressions or nasty new bugs that need to be addressed?
> > >
> > > Does HEAD compile and pass regression tests on all OSes and CPU
> > > architectures? FATE looks reasonably green right now but I would
> > > like to hear more explicit OKs from you as well.
> > The sooner we release the sooner we are back to normal development
> > if you ask about outstanding issues, well
> > [...]
> What I'm worried about are regressions, everything else is not
> a big deal.
> > also all the timestamping stuff is moderately risky and can uncover other
> > bugs
> I think moderately risky is an understatement.
> > PS: It might make sense to do another release soon in case the above issue
> > end up being fixed. But i think delaying this one more is not good.
> > And i like to see the next done without a freeze of HEAD.
> Have you seen anything held back by the freeze? I did not.
just a second ago the reg tests passed my dozen fixes to the timestamping
iam holding that back, but iam not sure how long i will ;)
because ivans work will be simplified with it i think ...
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not
approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel