[FFmpeg-devel] release status

Víctor Paesa wzrlpy
Mon Mar 2 00:02:57 CET 2009


Robert Swain said:
> 2009/3/1 Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de>:
>> There has been a flurry of activity during the past days. ? I must
>> admit I have lost track of current issues. ? So, are there any
>> regression fixes pending or any regressions or nasty new bugs that
>> need to be addressed?
>> Does HEAD compile and pass regression tests on all OSes and CPU
>> architectures? ? FATE looks reasonably green right now but I would
>> like to hear more explicit OKs from you as well.
> I think FATE looking relatively green is an overstatement.
> http://fate.multimedia.cx/
> From the top down:

> Windows Cygwin
> - GCC 4.2.4
>   - fails wma regression (currently at r17692)
>     http://fate.multimedia.cx/index.php?test_result=10386931
> - GCC 3.4.6
>   - fails wma regression test (currently r17692)
>     http://fate.multimedia.cx/index.php?test_result=10394239

If I recall correctly, Cygwin has never passed wma test.
Hence no real regressions. Reason could be that newlib C library
floating point calculus differs from its GNU counterpart.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list