[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Make RM demuxer behave better with -an option

Kostya kostya.shishkov
Mon Mar 2 14:59:25 CET 2009


On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 07:35:05AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Kostya,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Kostya <kostya.shishkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The only obvious simplification I see for now is merging old and new format
> > demuxing - the only difference is that old format does not contain packet
> > headers and audio only (exactly like .wav and .avi).
> 
> that's funny, I just noticed that yesterday and was planning some
> testing today to see if it's really that simple as replacing that
> whole block by a single ff_rm_parse_packet(s, s->priv_data,
> s->streams[0], s->streams[0]->priv_data, pkt);. That be the most
> beautiful simplification of all.
> 
> Anyway, I'll see what else I can come up with, I still don't like all
> these buffers. And I have multirate-patches. :-).

Personally I don't like anything by Real, especially their container
and RV3/4 codecs. I suspect that something more generic should be done
to handle both video and audio mess (i.e. subpackets in single packet
and single frame spanning several subpackets or both).
 
> Ronald




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list