[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Do not assume long is same width as x86 register in swscale.

Ramiro Polla ramiro.polla
Mon Mar 16 21:18:45 CET 2009


On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Reimar D?ffinger
<Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:13:56PM -0200, Ramiro Polla wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Reimar D?ffinger
>> <Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
>> > I think I sent a more extensive patch for that, I just never got around
>> > to test it properly (regression tests were always failing for me back
>> > then), you should be able to find it in the archives...
>> The only patch I can remember is this one:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/76182
> I meant the one: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] use x86_reg in libswscale
> on Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:40:40 +0100

Sorry for the delay, but I was caught up with the regression test
failures you mentioned.

Regression tests for mingw-w64 now pass with --disable-optimizations,
the strtod() hack, and the printf() hack for seek tests. To
--enable-gpl, updated patch must be applied, and the tests pass.

swscale-example crashes on funnyYCode (couldn't there be a better name
for this?). I'll look further later but I'm guessing it has something
to do with the OS not allowing malloc'd code to run.

Ramiro Polla
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libswscale_x86_reg.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 12200 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090316/432aecdb/attachment.obj>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list