[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] G722 decoder
Wed Mar 25 18:25:26 CET 2009
On 3/25/2009 10:11 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:58:50AM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>> On 3/25/2009 9:43 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>> Maybe you could be kind enough to explain how *any* program can be
>>> distributed as LGPL v2.1+ in your view. It seems to be plain
>>> impossible from what you write.
> Answer my question.
>> But "as is" ffmpeg.c without modifications cannot be considered a "Library"
> Sure, but the LGPL can be applied to programs that are not libraries.
> The wording of the LGPL becomes a bit awkward in this case.
Yes and, according to the license, it becomes awkward and then weak.
Legal terms are usually not mean to be weak like this.
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
checking for life_signs in -lkenny... no
FFmpeg maintainer http://www.ffmpeg.org
More information about the ffmpeg-devel