[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] G722 decoder
Wed Mar 25 19:25:28 CET 2009
On 3/25/2009 10:31 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:25:26AM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>> On 3/25/2009 10:11 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:58:50AM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>> On 3/25/2009 9:43 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>>>> Maybe you could be kind enough to explain how *any* program can be
>>>>> distributed as LGPL v2.1+ in your view. It seems to be plain
>>>>> impossible from what you write.
>>> Answer my question.
>>>> But "as is" ffmpeg.c without modifications cannot be considered a "Library"
>>> Sure, but the LGPL can be applied to programs that are not libraries.
>>> The wording of the LGPL becomes a bit awkward in this case.
>> Yes and, according to the license, it becomes awkward and then weak.
>> Legal terms are usually not mean to be weak like this.
> You will hear with dismay that the wording in v3 is improved.
Then why don't you upgrade the license ?
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
checking for life_signs in -lkenny... no
FFmpeg maintainer http://www.ffmpeg.org
More information about the ffmpeg-devel