[FFmpeg-devel] full swscale relicensing to LGPL
Thu Mar 26 04:44:44 CET 2009
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:52:35 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:17:35PM +0000, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 14:58 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 07:42:26AM +0000, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > I know I contributed lot of big-endian fixes to rgb2rgb.c and do not see
>> > > myself on the list. However, those contributions might got rewritten by
>> > > someone else, nor those were such big work, but of course I agree to
>> > > LGPL.
>> > The list was just about asm code as the header of rgb2rgb.c says
>> > "The C code (not assembly, MMX, ...) of this file can be used
>> > under the LGPL license."
>> > also as the company one sidedly changed the offer repeatly and while
>> > pretending it was always what was previously agreed, i suspect
>> > noone will dare to take it, but i might be wrong. I for one certainly
>> > wont touch it, not only am i not "the ffmpeg developerS" nor do i want
>> > to be surprised with a claim of having taken the money for then yet
>> > another offer claimed by them afterwards.
>> This means that you canceled the LGPL license change?
>Did you read this thread?
it seems like everyone's lgpl offer is still valid.
all thats left is for someone to go over the history and split/comment
the gpl/lgpl code. so we can determine what needs to be rewritten.
assuming someone wants to do this task, personally i'd wait until some
company paid for that job.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel