[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] QCELP postfilter
Wed Apr 7 02:21:44 CEST 2010
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 02:08:17AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:36:28PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > >> that should be ok, and i volunteer as one of the test subjects, where
> > >> can i download the .wav files? and of course it would be great to have
> > >> original pre encoder waves to for reference
> > >
> > > I'll try to do this tomorrow, sorry for being so slow.
> > http://people.gnome.org/~rbultje/ff/
> > I chose a reasonable-quality source file (.mov), hoping that'll make
> > the testing easier and more pleasant. If you need an additional
> > poor-quality one, let me know and I'll add it (same numbering). The 7
> > files are (in no particular order):
> > - Reference code with or without postfilter (2)
> > - FFmpeg decoder without postfilter (1)
> > - FFmpeg decoder with Reference postfilter (1)
> > - FFmpeg decoder with Reference converted into our postfilter in 3 steps (3)
> > I'd be very pleased if you could test blindly and tell me which you
> > like best. Vitor, could you test also?
> they all sound like shit, maybe 2.wav is amogth the better but its shit as
ahh and i realize now that writing that here will affect other people.
testers oppinon should not be available to other testers before the
end otherwise the results might be skewed
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The real ebay dictionary, page 1
"Used only once" - "Some unspecified defect prevented a second use"
"In good condition" - "Can be repaird by experienced expert"
"As is" - "You wouldnt want it even if you were payed for it, if you knew ..."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel