[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Autodetect pthreads

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Tue Apr 20 01:58:47 CEST 2010

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:49:29PM -0700, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
> 2010/4/19 M?ns Rullg?rd <mans at mansr.com>:
> > Jason Garrett-Glaser <darkshikari at gmail.com> writes:
> > Had you taken the time to actually stop and listen to what I had to
> > say, you would have realised that I was in fact looking for a good
> > solution. ?Thanks for wasting my time.
> And yet you reverted my commit without reading it or explaining why it
> was wrong, claiming it was "done out of spite".  Obviously you are not
> looking for a good solution, you are looking to flame me.
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser
> > <darkshikari at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Anyways, this is my final goodbye.  It is clear that the ffmpeg
> >> community does not want me here.
> >
> > Mans != FFmpeg community.
> The ffmpeg community stands behind Mans.  Therefore, Mans == FFmpeg community.

thats nonsense.
Iam not standing behind mans. Ive not checked the ML for a few hours, and
what happens, you 2 start this odd fight.

First id like to point out that mans has no right to revoke anyones commit
access. There may be exceptions to this like some accounts being compromised,
2 people starting a revert-commit war, someone commiting uuencoded CP or
other emergencies but certainly not what was commited.

That said mans is configure maintainer and it is his decission what goes in
configure as long as he is configure maintainer.

I really think that we will be able to find a solution that makes everyone
And i do agree with you that a simple ./configure && make should produce a
binary on a modern desktop system that uses all available cpus when that is

That said i think it would be a good idea if neither of you commit anything
that might anger the other further. That is i think "how to solve this" should
be discussed and only after you 2 agree should a commit happen.

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The real ebay dictionary, page 3
"Rare item" - "Common item with rare defect or maybe just a lie"
"Professional" - "'Toy' made in china, not functional except as doorstop"
"Experts will know" - "The seller hopes you are not an expert"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100420/66d7697e/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list