[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] asfenc: fix extended content header

Anton Khirnov wyskas
Sat Feb 20 09:40:49 CET 2010

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 02:36:00AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> do you know if this is the only case where this value is used?
> iam against skiping cases that where not skiped before without a very
> good reason.
> And especially "one file putted trash in there" is not a good reason at all
> what does the spec say?
> do we have other files using this?

the specs don't say much about tags with value type==byte array, but it
seems people can put pretty much any binary data in there and there's no
reason to expect it to be readable strings. all the files i've tested
confirm that.

i'm no ASF expert though, so other opinions welcome.

Anton Khirnov
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100220/aebbd9e9/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list