[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] 1st/3rd person doxy

Baptiste Coudurier baptiste.coudurier
Fri Jul 9 04:48:25 CEST 2010

On 07/08/2010 07:45 PM, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Baptiste Coudurier<baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com>  writes:
>> On 07/08/2010 07:10 PM, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>> Jason Garrett-Glaser<darkshikari at gmail.com>   writes:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Michael Niedermayer<michaelni at gmx.at>   wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> i get no free time and no sleep :(
>>>>> heres the vote about the most important bikeshed this year.
>>>>> following options exist, also our script can handle people dynamically
>>>>> adding new options and options rated equal but it cant handle it if you
>>>>> dont duplicate my typos so copy&   paste them.
>>>>> things should be listed and numbered in order of preferrance, with most
>>>>> favored at the top
>>>>> voting method in case they differ is the schulze methode and voting
>>>>> application is svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/michael/trunk/ffvotetov
>>>>> 1. add a 1st person rule to policy
>>>>> 2. 1st or 3rd person as the maintainer prefers, no addition to policy needed
>>>>> 3. add a 3rd person rule to policy
>>>>> 4. further discussion
>>>>> 5. add a 1st person perogative rule to policy
>>>> 6.  Votes like this are stupid.
>>> I vote 6.
>> Your votes are considered void.
> What do you imagine gives you the authority to make such proclamations?

I assumed that you cannot vote for a non-existent item. In this case, it 
makes these votes, void.

However it seems that you can add new options, I'm against that btw.

Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
FFmpeg maintainer                                  http://www.ffmpeg.org

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list