[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Use more appropriate types when decoding vorbisfloats

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sun Jul 25 23:40:13 CEST 2010


On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:41:08PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> 
> > and LL is not wrong, it can be needed in expressions
> 
> And L can't?  I find that hard to believe. 

patcheck is a tool to show code that likely has issues not that certainly
has issues.


> Will you ban for loops
> next time someone uses one incorrectly?

will you stop trolling?
patcheck and banning are 2 different things besides
how many uses of <num>L in libav/ffmpeg are correct, how many wrong
or at least unneeded?

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give
it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For
even the very wise cannot see all ends. -- Gandalf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100725/42be2ba5/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list