[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] VP8 decoder
Tue Jun 22 22:05:16 CEST 2010
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:23:58PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Janne Grunau <janne-ffmpeg at jannau.net> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:05:53PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >> Alex Converse <alex.converse at gmail.com> writes:
> >> >> I risk to start a bikeshed, but should we mark it as experimental until it
> >> >> pass the conformance test suite?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > IIRC experimental doesn't work that way on decoders
> >> I would have said it does work like that, but I'm not sure.
> > No, it doesn't work for decoders. Baptiste opposed too much against it.
> Did he have any remotely rational arguments? If not, ignore him.
a rational argument might be that our code needs testing and decoders
do less harm than encoders if they fail
besides developers should not be ignored unless the one calling wants
himself being igored if his arguments are preceived irrational by others
(thinking of pkgconfig & optiizations in libavutil here)
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is
On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem).
On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite number
of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel