[FFmpeg-devel] Awakening of FFH264
Tue Mar 23 19:47:02 CET 2010
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:57:04AM -0700, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Kvikant, Christian wrote:
> >> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >>> Sorry, but what is the point of this? ?There is already a fantastic,
> >>> open source H.264 encoder in x264.
> >> I agree totally. FFH264 is not up to par nether regarding quality nor size.
> >> The only reason for this exercise was licensing. If the feeling is that
> >> FFH264 will never become part of FFmpeg, then we will keep it as a separate
> >> patch.
> > a simple and small encoder could be usefull for regression testing.
> If the encoder uses practically no features it's totally useless for
> regression testing...
It shouldnt be hard to use lots of features and just write random values ;)
for regression tests that would be fine.
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Incandescent light bulbs waste a lot of energy as heat so the EU forbids them.
Their replacement, compact fluorescent lamps, much more expensive, dont fit in
many old lamps, flicker, contain toxic mercury, produce a fraction of the light
that is claimed and in a unnatural spectrum rendering colors different than
in natural light. Ah and we now need to turn the heaters up more in winter to
compensate the lower wasted heat. Who wins? Not the environment, thats for sure
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel