[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Dynamic plugins loading

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Tue Nov 2 22:46:41 CET 2010

On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:36:01PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 12 brumaire, an CCXIX, Stefano Sabatini a ?crit?:
> > Speaking of technical reasons, which is the advantage of using
> > libxvidcore compared to the native FFmpeg MPEG 4.2 encoder?
> That is a question I am interested also.
> I usually use XviD when I need MPEG 4.2, because I did not manage to find
> settings for the native encoder that yield as good a quality-for-bitrate as
> XviD -mbd 2 / vhq=4 in fixed_quant=2 mode. But the native encoder has a
> whole lot of settings and knobs to tweak.
> I think some presets files would be very useful.

I think debuging the differences would be usefull
is it caused by quantization, motion estimation, scenechange detection
macroblock decisison ?
both we and xvid could benefit from knowing this

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not
approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20101102/86e98b67/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list