[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Dynamic plugins loading

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sun Nov 7 15:14:26 CET 2010

On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:41:37PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Alex Converse <alex.converse at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It all depends on how you define "care about Fedora." If by "care
> > about Fedora" you mean FFmpeg builds and runs on fedora then yes we do
> > care about Fedora. In fact FFmpeg builds and runs on Fedora better
> > than Windows whose user base dwarves that of Fedora. If by "care about
> > Fedora" you mean will bend over backwards to arbitrary Fedora policies
> > to be included in their software distribution then, while I can't
> > speak for everyone, I don't "care" about Fedora. By that definition I
> > also don't care about Windows.
> Care about Fedora = Care whether FFmpeg can be included in Fedora
> Anyway, Michael Niedermayer says you do care about Fedora, which means

i speak about myself not about what others care or do not care about.

> if Fedora requests for dynamic plugin loading, you would implement it,
> right?

we had this argument already, to repeat the awnser you have no authority in
fedora, and noone who has authority in fedora made any request.
If what you want is what fedora whats is questionable at best.

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no
further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20101107/6bfacc0f/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list