[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Google WebP support

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Fri Oct 1 03:38:06 CEST 2010

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 05:44:03PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> On 9/30/10 4:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 04:01:18PM -0700, Mike Melanson wrote:
>>> On 09/30/2010 03:55 PM, Pascal Massimino wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Pascal Massimino<
>>>> pascal.massimino at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>> Mike!
>>>>> you're too fast!
>>> Sorry; had the day off and was a bit bored when I saw this news come
>>> through.
>>>>> what about  http://pastebin.com/FbUvG77M
>>>> attached, too. That's easier
>>> I was about to take the independent demuxer route as well. But then I
>>> decided to figure out how the general image handling system operates. It
>>> looks like the trade-off here is that the general image approach is less
>>> code while the independent demuxer allows for the more advanced features
>>> like metadata.
>>> Commence the bikeshedding regarding which approach will go into FFmpeg.
>> i prefer your patch mike, currently
> Metadata handling will be a mess in the image2 demuxer.

that reminds me that i wanted the metadata code be put in libavcodec
would moving it there solve this?

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The real ebay dictionary, page 1
"Used only once"    - "Some unspecified defect prevented a second use"
"In good condition" - "Can be repaird by experienced expert"
"As is" - "You wouldnt want it even if you were payed for it, if you knew ..."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20101001/3e11620f/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list