[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] FFmpeg leader
Sat Oct 2 14:35:05 CEST 2010
On 10/02/2010 02:25 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This is untrue
> the assert changes have been discussed a long time ago with noone caring.
> the per codec parameters too have been discussed and ive explained that
> i plan to implement them through a priv_avclass in AVCodec and AVOption
> access to the private context, noone disagreed from what i remember
> and the swscale api changes have briefly been discussed in the IRC thread
> that was triggered due to the 10bit dithering trolling. Yes the final
> implementation was a hair differnt than what was discussed because its
> simpler as it is now but it all was discussed.
The problem here is that we lost those discussions in the mailing list
flood. I think probably _most_ of this annoyance would be mitigate if
those changes would happen on a split branch and then merged on a pull
request on the mailing list. Same goes for the issue you had with Mans
commits colliding with your uncommitted work. We have better tools,
using them _should_ reduce this kind of friction.
Beside that I'd like to have the situation composed since now we have
most people unhappy over a misunderstanding.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel