Mon Oct 4 05:35:53 CEST 2010
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:46:51AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 10/04/2010 04:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Please elaborate, what part of "mans took the server down intentionally and
>> putted a sarcastic message up" is untrue paranoid thinking?
> you forgot to put "his own" in the sentence. That makes the whole
> situation in a different perspective.
> The new fate is a pet project of mans, hosted on mans' hardware.
> It started since he wanted to scratch some itches he had with old mike's
of course if mphq where hosted on attilas hardward would that give him the
right to take it down (MLs, SVN,...) with a "oops guys i have a bad day"
or do you think its ok if source forge or gitourious did that on their
The responsible thing to do is to post a message like
"I am leaving this project and will stop running fate as its on my hardware
as soon as its moved elsewhere or if noone does that then in a week"
Its perfectly fine if a admin is busy or has a bad day or a problem with his
job, familiy or otherwise and is unable to deal with things in that time be
that a day or a month but its IMHO totally unacceptable to intentionally
sabotage/deface project pages like this no matter whos hardware and software
That said i of course see your point i just think it doesnt justify what he
He could just have left it running for a few days for us to put it up
elsewhere and update DNS.
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I hate to see young programmers poisoned by the kind of thinking
Ulrich Drepper puts forward since it is simply too narrow -- Roman Shaposhnik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel