[FFmpeg-devel] comming a patch question

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Tue Sep 21 15:39:50 CEST 2010

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:10:51PM +0300, Maksym Veremeyenko wrote:
> Hi,
> Years ago i was trying to submit a patch to support deinterlacing of  
> http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2009-October/077279.html
> but that was rejected.

i said in that thread:
"fine but as said this is all pretty much dead code, there are better
 deinterlacers that should be ported to libavfilter" 

thats not a rejection

> Yesterday's commit to ffmpeg titled *Support deinterlacing of YUVJ420P.*
> http://git.ffmpeg.org/?p=ffmpeg;a=commitdiff;h=735bbaed004cf4033af6c127c919d973941523fb
> is similar the same, but for YUVJ420P.
> The question is: are rules and policies only for svn's anonymous readers?

who overstepped which rule?

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Frequently ignored awnser#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. User
questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML.
And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100921/0fd528fb/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list