[FFmpeg-devel] comming a patch question
Tue Sep 21 15:39:50 CEST 2010
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:10:51PM +0300, Maksym Veremeyenko wrote:
> Years ago i was trying to submit a patch to support deinterlacing of
> but that was rejected.
i said in that thread:
"fine but as said this is all pretty much dead code, there are better
deinterlacers that should be ported to libavfilter"
thats not a rejection
> Yesterday's commit to ffmpeg titled *Support deinterlacing of YUVJ420P.*
> is similar the same, but for YUVJ420P.
> The question is: are rules and policies only for svn's anonymous readers?
who overstepped which rule?
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Frequently ignored awnser#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. User
questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML.
And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel