[FFmpeg-devel] [FFmpeg-devel-irc] IRC log for 2010-09-17#
Fri Sep 24 21:04:22 CEST 2010
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:02:17AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> On date Friday 2010-09-24 04:44:23 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 01:00:27AM +0100, irc at mansr.com wrote:
>>>> [19:37:31] <Dark_Shikari> 01:08 < pengvado> do you think it would matter if I did the committing and threatened to fork libavfilter if people complain?
>>>> [19:37:34] <Dark_Shikari> :)
>>>> [19:37:43] <mru> of what?
>>>> [19:37:50] <Dark_Shikari> hqdn3d, yadif, etc
>>>> [19:37:54] <Dark_Shikari> i.e. actually useful filters
>>> please commit
>>> and please keep theh aggressivness and threatening in kindergarten
>> People even talk about forks, the problem is that we lack
> yes, its funny, everyone can contribute and commit but people dont and
> instead want to fork
> so let me ask thouse who want to fork.
> why do you want to fork?
Despite my name being on that quote, I don't want to fork. Context:
<J_Darnley> [various stuff about importing filters into x264cli]
<pengvado> Why are you importing yadif and hqdn3d rather than linking to libavfilter?
<J_Darnley> It'd never be committed. Bikeshed this, cosmetic that.
<pengvado> Do you think it would matter if I did the committing and threatened to fork libavfilter if people complain?
So in this case, the fork is what's happening by default (ask J_Darnley,
Baptiste Coudurier, or anyone else involved in the yadif patch for why),
and what I was planning to maybe do was commit something to libavfilter if
they couldn't fix it on their own.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel