[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffmpeg.org deuglify shame
michaelni at gmx.at
Tue Apr 26 16:20:35 CEST 2011
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:29:57AM -0400, compn wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:15:41 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:40:01PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:14:26 +0200
> >> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 03:23:09PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> >> > > Put violator entries in table instead of list. Fix broken links.
> >> > > shame | 478
> >> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >> > > 1 file changed, 325 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
> >> > > 2e897b0bbdcd57a6fdd65fc56c0ad84a2eec6b9d
> >> > > ffmpeg-web_deuglify_shame.patch
> >> >
> >> > the links work fine for me, besides i was thinking of droping the
> >> > shame page entirely.
> >> For what reasons? Is the Hall of Shame effective enough in gaining
> >> compliance and awareness for us to keep maintaining it?
> >I didnt follow it precissly but ive difficulty naming a single company
> >that stoped violating because of that page.
> a bunch of companies coming on the issue tracker, saying 'my boss
> saw our company in the shame page and i'm here to fix it'. of course, my
> examples are still marked 'open'.
> imo shame should be gotten rid of until everything is updated. also
please remove shame then
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know
nothing. -- Socrates
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel