Fri Feb 4 03:32:36 CET 2011
Jason Garrett-Glaser <jason at x264.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> Latest discussion of our compromis on publically logged #ffmpeg-devel without
>> <michaelni> hi mans, ben said i have to reconcile with you for any compromis
>> <michaelni> iam not so much interrested to join you guys than iam concerned about the community spliting up and leaving both sides
>> <michaelni> ping mru
>> <mru> explain "compromise"
>> <mru> so far the only hints you've let slip have been totally unacceptable
>> <mru> and "ben said ..." doesn't exactly convince me you understand what this is about
>> <michaelni> compromise = "roots replaced by neutral people, stef,me,carl,reimar,baptiste joining commiters, clarification of leadership of new team, clarification of file maintainers vs commiters, some vission doc that lists goals of ffmpeg)
>> <mru> unacceptable
>> <michaelni> that is the idea for discussion
>> <michaelni> what part?
>> <mru> all of it
> Why have you two unilaterally decided that Mans can speak for all of
I speak only for myself.
mans at mansr.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel