[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Help poor git-n00b users to git-clone ffmpeg

Stefano Sabatini stefano.sabatini-lala
Sun Feb 6 15:30:19 CET 2011


On date Friday 2011-02-04 09:04:06 -0500, Ronald S. Bultje encoded:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Stefano Sabatini
> <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> wrote:
> > On date Friday 2011-02-04 00:50:54 -0900, Lou Logan encoded:
> >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:25:09 +0100
> >> Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On date Thursday 2011-02-03 15:55:36 -0900, Lou Logan encoded:
> >> > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:46:29 +0100
> >> > > Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Index: src/download
> >> > > > ===================================================================
> >> > > > --- src/download ? ? ? ?(revision 540)
> >> > > > +++ src/download ? ? ? ?(working copy)
> >> > > > @@ -67,6 +67,15 @@
> >> > > > ?</tbody>
> >> > > > ?</table>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +<p>
> >> > > > +In order to use the standard Git client to check out the source
> >>
> >> I would prefer something like:
> >>
> >> To use Git to retrieve the source code:
> >>
> >> It's a nit but shorter and more clear in my opinion. Sorry, I meant to
> >> mention this in my first message. Otherwise the HTML structure looks
> >> good to me with the update.
> >
> > What about:
> >
> > To use the standard Git client to retrieve the source code:
> >
> > or
> >
> > You can retrieve the source code with the standard Git client with the
> > command:
> 
> "... through the standard Git client by using the (following) command:"
> 
> (2x "with" isn't really pretty.)

Applied this one.
-- 
FFmpeg = Foolish and Freak Martial Peaceful Erudite Gadget



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list