[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] pkt_pts reordering

Ronald S. Bultje rsbultje
Mon Jan 10 15:30:10 CET 2011


On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Vladimir Pantelic <vladoman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Luca Barbato wrote:
>> On 01/10/2011 03:04 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> ?whats the use case for non timestamp opaque?
>> I could think about some use case that would work better with a void
>> pointer instead of a 64bit int but I might be wrong.
> yes, a void* value would be better indeed now
> The use case is to allow the user to carry frame private data from
> a pkt to decoded frame

That could be an AVPacket * also, in which case we no longer need pkt_pts/dts.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list