[FFmpeg-devel] Git switch is ready to go!
Sat Jan 15 02:16:32 CET 2011
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:56:17PM -0200, Ramiro Polla wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:25:38PM -0200, Ramiro Polla wrote:
> >> Sorry I haven't been following closely, but have we come to a
> >> consensus on what commits should be tagged with what name and has
> >> version.sh been updated?
> > AFAIK no. Iam also not aware of any consensus on what to tag in svn.
> This is related to keep ffmpeg having monotonically increasing
> revision numbers of some sort. In svn it doesn't matter what we tag.
> If we use git describe it matters.
This is bikeshed why does noone jump at it?
Anyway, my suggestion:
tag the very first commit with tag R (teh R00T 0f a11 evi1)
tag all interresting points where releases, branches whatever are made
official name is what
git describe --match R
This gives a single strictly monotone increasing number like svn and a uppercase
R to distingush from svns lower case r
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Incandescent light bulbs waste a lot of energy as heat so the EU forbids them.
Their replacement, compact fluorescent lamps, much more expensive, dont fit in
many old lamps, flicker, contain toxic mercury, produce a fraction of the light
that is claimed and in a unnatural spectrum rendering colors different than
in natural light. Ah and we now need to turn the heaters up more in winter to
compensate the lower wasted heat. Who wins? Not the environment, thats for sure
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel