[FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] New FFmpeg maintainership
Sat Jan 22 11:05:11 CET 2011
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:02:51PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Stefano Sabatini
> <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> wrote:
> > On date Wednesday 2011-01-19 01:58:53 +0100, Diego Biurrun encoded:
> >> The discontent reached the point where a fork was being contemplated
> >> and then planned, but it turned out that the momentum had soared way
> >> past critical mass and turned into a tidal wave of revolution. ?The
> >> focus moved from forking to avoiding a fork if possible.
> > But unfortunately it never passed from considering to ask to the
> > person/s which were considered the cause of the "problem" to change
> > for the last time, or to discuss this publically, giving a chance to
> > these persons to defend themselves, and eventually pose an ultimatum
> > and act in the case they failed.
> I've read this statement by various people in a variety of ways now. I
> want to make something very clear: this is not true. I won't spill all
> the details, but suffice to say that we felt that we tried enough and
> that another approach was needed to advance.
Then I'll clearly tell you that you were obviously the only ones to notice
More information about the ffmpeg-devel