[FFmpeg-devel] Donations and what happens with them

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sat Jan 29 17:53:04 CET 2011

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:37:43PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> I think a patch should be allowed to be applied if:
> - it improves something and does not make something else worse;
> - the submitter sincerely thinks that doing it in a better way would be too
>   much work for him;
> - no one volunteers to do it in a better way quickly, or said volunteer is
>   not quick enough;
> - the patch has a visible (greppable, if in comment) reference to the
>   discussion on how to do things right.

I like this

I would add that
- Better solutions found during review that arent implemented should be
  documented in a new issue on roundup

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110129/c2ae080e/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list