[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Add documentation for the image2 muxer.

Ronald S. Bultje rsbultje
Mon Jan 31 16:33:55 CET 2011


Hi,

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Sabatini
<stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> wrote:
> On date Friday 2011-01-28 23:38:41 +0100, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
>> On date Friday 2011-01-28 22:05:32 +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd encoded:
>> > Janne Grunau <janne-ffmpeg at jannau.net> writes:
>> >
>> > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:48:23PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> > >> On date Friday 2011-01-28 18:15:30 +0100, Janne Grunau encoded:
>> > >> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:03:54PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> From 99ebfa17eee5bb94dbab664714f4269a99a0e330 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > >> From: Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it>
>> > >> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:53:00 +0100
>> > >> Subject: [PATCH] Add documentation for the image2 muxer.
>> > >>
>> > >> ---
>> > >> ?doc/muxers.texi | ? 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > >> ?1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> > >>
>> > >> diff --git a/doc/muxers.texi b/doc/muxers.texi
>> > >> index c3dcf11..5adfaf1 100644
>> > >> --- a/doc/muxers.texi
>> > >> +++ b/doc/muxers.texi
>> > >> @@ -18,4 +18,55 @@ enabled muxers.
>> > >>
>> > >> ?A description of some of the currently available muxers follows.
>> > >>
>> > >> + at section image2
>> > >> +
>> > >> +Image file muxer.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +This muxer writes video frames to multiple image files specified by a
>> > >> +pattern.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The pattern may contain the string "%d" or "%0 at var{N}d", which
>> > >> +specifies the position of the characters representing a numbering in
>> > >> +the filenames. If the form "%d0 at var{N}d" is used, the string
>> > >> +representing the number in each filename is 0-padded and @var{N} is
>> > >> +the total number of 0-padded digits representing the number. The
>> > >
>> > > is this even correct? probably just easy to misunderstand. following is
>> > > shorter and easier to understand:
>> >
>> > That's almost reminiscent of the Holy Hand-grenade recital from Monty
>> > Python...
>> >
>> > > If the form "%d0 at var{N}d" is used, the string representing the number
>> > > in each filename has @var{N} digits and is 0-padded.
>> >
>> > ... is 0-padded to @var{N} digits.
>>
>> Updated.
>
> Ping.

Sorry, was a little slow, applied.

Ronald



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list