[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] download: clarify Libav maintainership/committership status
ikalvachev at gmail.com
Sun Jun 26 18:57:28 CEST 2011
On 6/25/11, Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> wrote:
> On date Friday 2011-06-24 20:16:38 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:27:45PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> > On date Friday 2011-06-24 17:37:16 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
>> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:01:33PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> > > > Use "Libav developers" for qualifying both administrators and
>> > > > committers of the Libav fork.
>> > >
>> > > To the best of my knowledge this does not represent the truth
>> > Updated.
>> > --
>> > FFmpeg = Fabulous Fast Most Power Evanescent Game
>> > download | 6 +++---
>> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> > 271a3f550632298bdec490bbf630794144467357
>> > 0001-download-clarify-Libav-maintainership-committership-.patch
>> > From 428f2d6b014b1819d3fa802a7b73b030eec0cf05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it>
>> > Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:39:01 +0200
>> > Subject: [PATCH] download: clarify Libav maintainership/committership
>> > status
>> > Use generic labels for qualifying both administrators and committers
>> > of the Libav fork.
>> > ---
>> > src/download | 6 +++---
>> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> > diff --git a/src/download b/src/download
>> > index 10bc053..f21acbf 100644
>> > --- a/src/download
>> > +++ b/src/download
>> > @@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ developers and groups of developers are available.
>> > <td><a
>> > href="git://git.libav.org/libav.git">git://git.libav.org/libav.git</a></td>
>> > <td><a href="http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git">Browse</a></td>
>> > <td><a
>> > href="http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz">Snapshot</a></td>
>> > - <td>?</td>
>> > - <td>8 developers</td>
>> > - <td></td>
>> > + <td>Libav administrators</td>
>> > + <td>Libav committers</td>
>> thats a circular definition and IMHO worse than leaving the fields
>> with "unknown" because it gives the impression that its known who
>> the commiters & admins are
>> > + <td>Libav project (forked from FFmpeg)</td>
> Updated. I'll push soon if I see no more comments.
I think last time I asked there were 11 committers/pushers (identified by git).
I'm strongly against replacing "?" with "-".
"-" would indicate that this field doesn't apply (like in the mirrors above).
"?" indicates that there are some, but that information is not available/public.
I think I'll be OK to put both fields as "?".
If libav people want these fields filled with actual and correct
information, they just have to provide it.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel