[FFmpeg-devel] FFV1 Specification
pb at das-werkstatt.com
Fri Apr 20 08:49:09 CEST 2012
On 04/20/2012 01:21 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> both ways are doable but its easy to add it to the ffv1 stream so
> maybe we should just do that [...]
>From your point of view as a digital video expert, which approach would
you consider more reasonable?
The great thing about FFv1 is that it's lightweight and straightforward.
I wouldn't want to unnecessarily pack "bloat-shinystuff(tm)" into it for
no good reason ;)
More information about the ffmpeg-devel