[FFmpeg-devel] FFV1 Specification

Peter B. pb at das-werkstatt.com
Fri Apr 20 15:29:23 CEST 2012

On 04/20/2012 01:35 PM, Dave Rice wrote:
>> The great thing about FFv1 is that it's lightweight and straightforward.
>> I wouldn't want to unnecessarily pack "bloat-shinystuff(tm)" into it for
>> no good reason ;)
> A slight advantage to store interlaced video compressed as fields rather than frames is that the video would likely compress more efficiently.
> Dave Rice
I think you got me wrong here:
I didn't say *not* to store interlaced material in fields (I'm assuming
that's already happening now in FFv1?), but to where to store
information how to interpret the field-order: TFF or BFF.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list