[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] web: Copy FFmpeg Logo by Makefile instead of cronjob
thilo.borgmann at googlemail.com
Sun Apr 22 22:44:14 CEST 2012
Am 22.04.12 19:46, schrieb Reimar Döffinger:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 07:36:30PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 08:22:40PM +0200, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>>> Am 19.04.12 19:18, schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
>>>>> Makefile | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>> 47b04de93a2e972467f8f6b6a55e63ac3f570b88 0001-web-Let-the-Makefile-copy-the-website-logo-according.patch
>>>>> From 57ab223b421e83f75761bd7d77098bbf5fd5ea84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>> From: Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgmann at googlemail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:37:53 +0200
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] web: Let the Makefile copy the website logo according to src/logik.
>>>> has the makefile been tested with all combinations of copy cases ?
>>> Just retestet. Works well for me for none/$(DATE)-standard/$(DATE).png files
>>> with and without existing htdocs/ffmpeg-logo.png.
>> have the consequences of this being run by a cron job and hook at the
>> same time been considered ? that is race conditions ?
> The worst that should be possible to happen (assuming we keep the cron
> job from running too close to midnight) is that there are two cps
> running with same source and destination.
> I don't know for sure but I'd expect that should not cause an issue.
> (a bigger issue might be the web server reading the file while it's
> still being copied, but I don't really think this is relevant either).
Well the idea was not to keep the cron job, wasn't it?
Otherwise I don't know if a lock file might help or even increase problematic
More information about the ffmpeg-devel