[FFmpeg-devel] Patch to documentation (ffmpeg-web)

Lou Logan lou at lrcd.com
Thu Aug 16 09:35:10 CEST 2012


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012, at 09:52 PM, Misha Penkov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The attached patch includes a link to updated FFmpeg tutorial sources.
> 
> Michael
>
> From 36f436f69ff6bd76eaf6aed96dd38d9793f4f21d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael Penkov <misha.penkov at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:44:59 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] Include link to updated tutorial source.
> 
> ---
>  src/documentation |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/documentation b/src/documentation
> index fc7cf03..264ac64 100644
> --- a/src/documentation
> +++ b/src/documentation
> @@ -49,5 +49,6 @@ describes how to add a filter to libavfilter.</li>
>  <li><a href="http://www.inb.uni-luebeck.de/~boehme/using_libavcodec.html">Using libavformat and libavcodec</a> by
>  Martin Böhme, a good overview of the FFmpeg APIs.</li>
>  <li><a href="http://dranger.com/ffmpeg/">An FFmpeg and SDL Tutorial</a>
> -by Stephen Dranger, explains how to write a video player based on FFmpeg.</li>
> +by Stephen Dranger, explains how to write a video player based on FFmpeg
> +(<a href="https://github.com/mpenkov/ffmpeg-tutorial">updated source code</a> by Michael Penkov).</li>

I think "updated version" is a better phrase in this case, but it's not
a strong opinion so either is fine for me. I also wouldn't mind if you
make a new list item for your tutorial instead of appending the Dranger
description, but again I'm fine with either...so that makes this a long
winded "LGTM".

Thanks for providing an updated tutorial. Do you plan on keeping it
relatively up to date?


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list