[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] faq: disambiguate "join".

Nicolas George nicolas.george at normalesup.org
Sat Jul 28 18:24:07 CEST 2012

Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXX, Alexander Strasser a écrit :
>   IMHO sounds a bit too teacher-like (sorry, really no pun intended). Maybe:
>     To "join" video files is quite ambiguous. The following list explains
>     the different kinds of "joining" and points out how those are addressed
>     in FFmpeg. To join video files may mean:
> Or similar. No strong opinion on this one...

I changed it to adopt your wording.

>   Is there a preposition missing between above and below? "in"?

I had the same impression when re-reading it, but in fact on: the
preposition is hidden in the text of the link, with texinfo's strange

>   "using ... options to ffmpeg" sounds odd. Maybe  "giving ... options to",
> or "invoking ffmpeg with ... options".
>   Maybe native English speakers can clarify. I am not so please take my
> comments with a grain of salt.

Changed like that.

> Good work on making the FAQ more useful,

Thanks, pushed both patches.


  Nicolas George
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20120728/ea9acf6e/attachment.asc>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list