[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Optimization of AMR NB and WB decoders for MIPS

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Tue Jun 5 17:33:10 CEST 2012

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:00:21AM -0400, compn wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:32:52 +0000, Babic, Nedeljko wrote:
> >Would it be enough to create texi file (mips.texi for example) in 
> >doc folder that has this copyright and list of files on which this 
> >copyright is applicable?
> if my reading of the notice is correct, then yes, that would be enough
> to satisfy its demands. i am not a lawyer, so if someone wants to
> verify this by asking fsf or sflc about it, that would be nice.

my reading would be that, considering its in the source and the LGPL
require source to be made available that alone should be sufficient
as source should qualify as
"other materials provided with the distribution"

but iam happy to have it in the docs too

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the
dead. -- Aristotle 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20120605/5d0fcda9/attachment.asc>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list